PDA

View Full Version : If True, Awesome!


Bman505
11-16-2009, 10:45 AM
Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to
the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very
carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping
some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.

Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and
require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become
the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about
unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun.

Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not
only affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as
a clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was
advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a
"monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals.

Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a
right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and
those persons who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms" shall
be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters
have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are
capable of responding to "any situation that may arise."

Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be
required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and
driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate
government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state
should they be asked to do so," Maslack says.

Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the
least restrictive laws of any state .. it's currently the only state
that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit.
This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has
resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation.

This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have
to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own
guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.

XDSUBCOMPACT9
11-16-2009, 11:39 AM
yes i read this on a forum and think all states should have this...
if not i want to move next door to vt...lol

jlsalc
11-16-2009, 12:06 PM
Now that is awesome.

Jizzle
11-16-2009, 03:26 PM
but check this out. its still requireing someone to register and they'll still have access to who has one and who doesn't.

Packing247
11-16-2009, 03:58 PM
Alaska also has a "no permit required" to carry concealed.
Although I do believe that "what is good for the goose....." I don't think a person should be penalized for NOT owning a firearm. This is just probably the Democrat in me, so feel free to slap me down.....I probably need it!

Colt 45
11-16-2009, 04:47 PM
I hate to pop a bubble, but I believe that this has been proven to be false. I think this is a few years old and has already been shot down.

Max

Jizzle
11-16-2009, 05:01 PM
either way i don't like it. you should be able to do what you want. and if you don't mind being a statistic then dont' carry. it's all good.