It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To post, access all available content, and enjoy the benefits of being a member, it's free! please click here...

Concealed Carry Gun Forum

Go Back   Conceal Carry Forum > General Discussion and Questions > Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions

   
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2010, 02:48 PM
AussieRogue's Avatar
AussieRogue AussieRogue is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Albuqueruqe
Posts: 130
Default ATTN: N.M. MEMBERS: Pro-Gun Bill Pre-Filed in New Mexico for 2010 Session!

This bill made it almost all the way, last year. STAY ON YOUR LEGISLATORS to make sure it makes it ALL THE WAY this year! It is an important expansion of CCW rights in New Mexico.



Pro-Gun Bill Pre-Filed in New Mexico for 2010 Session!


Please Contact your State Legislators!

State Senator George Munoz (D-4) has pre-filed NRA-supported legislation for the 2010 thirty-day session of the New Mexico Legislature. Senate Bill 40 would allow concealed handgun licensees to lawfully carry handguns for self-defense in certain establishments that serve alcohol for consumption on the premises. Governor Bill Richardson (D) has agreed to message the bill, which will make it eligible for consideration during what is primarily a budget-only session.

During the 2009 Regular Session, the House approved similar legislation - House Bill 105 sponsored by State Representative Heaton (D-55) - on a 49 to 13 vote. That measure failed to receive final consideration in a Senate Committee. The Senate companion to that bill, Senate Bill 608 sponsored by Senator Munoz, was approved by the Senate and two House committees, but failed to reach a full House vote before the Legislature adjourned sine die. The pre-filed language of SB 40 tracks the version of the 2009 Senate bill as it was negotiated and reported out by both the House Judiciary and Business & Industry Committees, and the version of the 2009 House bill that was overwhelmingly approved by House members. The high points of the legislation are as follows:

* <LI class=MsoNormal style="COLOR: black; tab-stops: list .5in">Lifts the prohibition on carrying a firearm in a licensed liquor establishment for concealed handgun licensees IF the restaurant is licensed to serve beer and wine only, and derives no less than 60 percent of its annual gross receipts from the consumption of food. <LI class=MsoNormal style="COLOR: black; tab-stops: list .5in">Owners of such establishments may post them off-limits to license holders or may verbally instruct any license holder to leave the premises.
* Current ban on carrying a firearm while under the influence of an intoxicant remains in place and continues to apply to licensees.

SB 40 is a step in the right direction for concealed handgun licensees in New Mexico, which would join 40 other states that allow some form of carrying of firearms for personal protection in establishments that sell and serve alcohol.

Please contact your State Senators and State Representatives and urge them to co-sponsor SB 40. Legislators can sign onto the measure in the Clerk's office at the capitol in Santa Fe up until 5pm on Friday, January 15th. Contact information for your state lawmakers can be found by visiting http://www.nmlegis.gov/lcs/legislatorsearch.aspx.
__________________
Taurus 24/7 Pro 9MM
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2010, 04:58 PM
Bman505's Avatar
Bman505 Bman505 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 1,428
Default

Ya BABY!!! Let this be the year!
__________________
"I would rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2010, 05:06 PM
Colt 45's Avatar
Colt 45 Colt 45 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 628
Default

Thanks Aussie I was just going to post this and you beat me to it!

Max
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2010, 06:26 PM
Jizzle's Avatar
Jizzle Jizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Holloman AFB NM
Posts: 878
Default

But, applebees and similar places would still be off limits.
__________________
One cannot legislate the maniacs off the street... these maniacs can only be shut down by an armed citizenry. Indeed bad things can happen in nations where the citizenry is armed, but not as bad as those which seem to be threatening our disarmed citizenry in this country at this time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2010, 07:12 PM
Colt 45's Avatar
Colt 45 Colt 45 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 628
Default

Why is that? Do they post no firearms signs?

Max

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jizzle View Post
But, applebees and similar places would still be off limits.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-05-2010, 08:01 PM
NMDawg's Avatar
NMDawg NMDawg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Portales, NM
Posts: 88
Default

Places like Applebees and Chilis serve hard liquor not just beer and wine. Which would still be off limits. It's a start and I will take it but still falls short.
__________________
A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.

Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-05-2010, 08:16 PM
Colt 45's Avatar
Colt 45 Colt 45 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 628
Default

I don't understand why they would not include places that serve liquor.

Max

Quote:
Originally Posted by NMDawg View Post
Places like Applebees and Chilis serve hard liquor not just beer and wine. Which would still be off limits. It's a start and I will take it but still falls short.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-09-2010, 07:45 PM
Colt 45's Avatar
Colt 45 Colt 45 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 628
Default

This may not be a popular thing to say but let me play devil's advocate.

Is this bill really a good start? It seems that since it would only apply to restaurants that serve beer and wine, and no liquor it could be confusing and wind up making criminals out of well-meaning citizens.

What do y'all think?

Max
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-09-2010, 08:57 PM
Jizzle's Avatar
Jizzle Jizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Holloman AFB NM
Posts: 878
Default

lol ya it makes it more confusing.

but just OC and you know that any resturant that sells it you can't go in anyway and it makes it a lot simpler.
__________________
One cannot legislate the maniacs off the street... these maniacs can only be shut down by an armed citizenry. Indeed bad things can happen in nations where the citizenry is armed, but not as bad as those which seem to be threatening our disarmed citizenry in this country at this time.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-09-2010, 08:58 PM
Jizzle's Avatar
Jizzle Jizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Holloman AFB NM
Posts: 878
Default

not to mention, what do you do go in and ask the owner how much of his annual sales come from the sale of food vs alcohol? i mean seriously..
__________________
One cannot legislate the maniacs off the street... these maniacs can only be shut down by an armed citizenry. Indeed bad things can happen in nations where the citizenry is armed, but not as bad as those which seem to be threatening our disarmed citizenry in this country at this time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:57 AM.

Looking for information on other ATV Manufacturers? Head on over to visit our friends on these other forums specializing in the following:
Kawasaki ATV - Can-Am ATV - Polaris ATV - Suzuki ATV - Yamaha ATV - Honda ATV.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.